Bl. Hoh et al., Results after surgical and endovascular treatment of paraclinoid aneurysmsby a combined neurovascular team, NEUROSURGER, 48(1), 2001, pp. 78-89
OBJECTIVE: Advances in surgical and endovascular techniques have improved t
reatment for paraclinoid aneurysms. A combined surgical and endovascular te
am can formulate individualized treatment strategies for patients with para
clinoid aneurysms. Patients who are considered to be at high surgical risk
can be treated endovascularly to minimize morbidity. We reviewed the clinic
al and radiographic outcomes of 238 paraclinoid aneurysms treated by our co
mbined surgical and endovascular unit.
METHODS: From 1991 to 1999, the neurovascular team treated 238 paraclinoid
aneurysms in 216 patients at the Massachusetts General Hospital. The modali
ty of treatment for each aneurysm was chosen based on anatomic and clinical
risk factors, with endovascular treatment offered to patients considered t
o have higher surgical risks. One hundred eighty aneurysms were treated by
direct surgery, 57 were treated by endovascular occlusion, and one was trea
ted by surgical extracranial-intracranial bypass and endovascular internal
carotid artery balloon occlusion. Locations were transitional, 12 (5%); car
otid cave, 11 (5%); ophthalmic, 131 (55%); posterior carotid wall, 38 (16%)
; and superior hypophyseal 46 (19%). Lesions contained completely within th
e cavernous sinus were excluded from this analysis.
RESULTS: Using the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS), overall clinical outcomes w
ere excellent or good (GOS 5 or 4), 86%; fair (GOS 3), 7%; poor (GOS 2), 4%
; and death (GOS 1), 3%. Among the surgically treated patients, 90% experie
nced excellent or good outcomes (GOS 5 or 4), 6% had fair outcomes (GOS 3),
2% had poor outcomes (GOS 2), and 3% died (GOS 1). Among the endovascularl
y treated patients, 74% had excellent or good outcomes (GOS 5 or 4), 12% ha
d fair outcomes (GOS 3), 10% had poor outcomes (GOS 2), and 4% died (GOS 1)
. The overall major and minor complication rate from surgery was 29%, with
a 6% surgery-related permanent morbidity rate and a mortality rate of 0%. T
he overall major and minor complication rate from endovascular treatment wa
s 21%, with a 3% endovascular-related permanent morbidity rate and a 2% mor
tality rate. Visual outcomes for patients who presented with visual symptom
s were as follows: improved, 69%; no change, 25%; worsened, 6%; and new vis
ual deficits, 3%. In general, angiographic efficacy was lower in the endova
scular treatment group.
CONCLUSION: A combined team approach of direct surgery and endovascular coi
ling can lead to good outcomes in the treatment for paraclinoid aneurysms,
including high-risk lesions that might not have been treated in previous su
rgical series.