This Article draws on a rich array of deviant behavior in Russian enterpris
es to craft lessons for corporate governance theory. First, Professors Fox
and Heller define corporate governance by looking to the economic functions
of the firm. Based on this definition, they develop a typology that compre
hensively shows all the channels through which bad corporate governance can
inflict damage on a country's real economy. Second, they explain the cause
s of Russian enterprise fiascoes by looking to the particular initial condi
tions prevailing at privatization-untenable firm boundaries and insider all
ocation of firm shares-and the bargaining dynamics that have followed. This
focus offers a new perspective for a comparative corporate governance lite
rature derived from United States, Western European, and Japanese models. T
he analytic tools created in this Article can inform pressing debates acros
s contemporary corporate law, ranging from the theory of the close corporat
ion to the viability of "stakeholder" proposals.