Electrocardiographic and echocardiographic features that distinguish anomalous origin of the left coronary artery from pulmonary artery from idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy
Rkr. Chang et V. Allada, Electrocardiographic and echocardiographic features that distinguish anomalous origin of the left coronary artery from pulmonary artery from idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, PEDIAT CARD, 22(1), 2001, pp. 3-10
Many authors have reported noninvasive means of diagnosing anomalous left c
oronary artery from pulmonary artery (ALCAPA) and differentiating ALCAPA fr
om idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Systematic evaluation using the
se noninvasive diagnostic modalities is not available. To distinguish betwe
en ALCAPA and DCM using a systematic approach, we examined 23 patients with
ALCAPA (age 1 month to 23 years, median 7 months) and 23 patients with DCM
(age 5 days to 16 years, median 6.6 months). Standard 12-lead electrocardi
ograms (ECG) and 2-dimensional (2-D) and color Doppler echocardiograms were
performed. A logistic regression model was applied using ALCAPA diagnosis
as the dependent variable and ECG and echocardiographic findings as indepen
dent variables. A scoring system was created to establish the ALCAPA diagno
sis based on results from the logistic regression. On the logistic regressi
on, the ECG feature of QT pattern in aVL (Q wave greater than or equal to 3
mm deep with an inverted T wave) and echocardiographic features of right c
oronary artery diameter to aortic annulus ratio greater than or equal to 0.
14, increased papillary muscle echogenicity, and Doppler color flow of LCA
from aorta or pulmonary artery were the most significant differentiating fe
atures between the ALCAPA and DCM groups. A scoring system was developed us
ing the previous five variables and assigning a score of 1 to each variable
(-1 to Doppler color flow of LCA from aorta). The scoring system had sensi
tivity of 100% and specificity of 91% for ALCAPA diagnosis. Compared with p
revious reported diagnostic features in differentiating ALCAPA and DCM, the
scoring system had a much higher specificity and positive predictive value
. In conclusion, we selected the most useful ECG and echo-cardiographic fea
tures to differentiate between ALCAPA and DCM and created a scoring system
to aid clinical diagnosis. This scoring system may be useful in evaluating
children with acute congestive heart failure.