A report card on quality improvement for children's health care

Citation
Tg. Ferris et al., A report card on quality improvement for children's health care, PEDIATRICS, 107(1), 2001, pp. 143-155
Citations number
112
Categorie Soggetti
Pediatrics,"Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
PEDIATRICS
ISSN journal
00314005 → ACNP
Volume
107
Issue
1
Year of publication
2001
Pages
143 - 155
Database
ISI
SICI code
0031-4005(200101)107:1<143:ARCOQI>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
Objective. Improving the quality of health care is a national priority. Non etheless, no systematic effort has assessed the status of quality improveme nt (QI) initiatives for children or reviewed past research in child health care QI. This assessment is necessary to establish priorities for QI progra ms and research. Methods. To assess the status of QI initiatives and research, we reviewed t he literature and interviewed experts experienced in QI for child health se rvices. We defined QI as activities intended to close the gap between desir ed processes and outcomes of care and what is actually delivered. We classi fied reports published between 1985 and 1997 by publication characteristics , study design, clinical problem addressed, site of intervention, the QI me thod(s) used, and explicit association with a continuous quality improvemen t program. Results. We reviewed 68 reports meeting our definition of QI. More than hal f (48) were published after 1994. The reviewed reports included controlled evaluations in 36% of all identified interventions, and 3% of the reports w ere associated with continuous quality improvement. QI methods demonstratin g some effectiveness included reminder systems for office-based preventive services and inpatient pathways for complex care. Reportedly successful QI initiatives more commonly described improvement in administrative measures such as rate of hospitalization or length of stay rather than functional st atus or quality of life. Interviews found that barriers to QI for children were similar to those for adults, but were compounded by difficulties in me asuring child health outcomes, limited resources among public organizations and small provider groups, and relative lack of competition for pediatric tertiary care providers. Research and dissemination of QI for children were seen as less well developed than for adults. Conclusions. Attempts to improve the quality of child health services have been increasing, and the evidence we reviewed suggests that it is possible to improve the quality of care for children. Nonetheless, numerous gaps rem ain in the understanding of QI for children, and widespread improvement in the quality of health services for children faces significant barriers.