Rv. Baudinette et al., Aquatic and terrestrial locomotory energetics in a toad and a turtle: A search for generalisations among ectotherms, PHYSIOL B Z, 73(6), 2000, pp. 672-682
Murray short-necked turtles were trained to walk on a motorised treadmill a
nd to swim in a recirculating flume. Through filmed records, the frequency
of limb movement and the time that thrust was directed against the substrat
e were measured. The animals wore masks when walking and accessed air when
swimming from a ventilated capsule placed on top of the water surface. Meas
urement of the exhalant O-2 and CO2 levels from these devices enabled the m
easurement of metabolic rates. Equivalent data were obtained from swimming
and hopping cane toads, although repeatable measures of limb frequency and
contact times were not obtained due to the intermittent form of locomotion
in this species. Comparing the cost of transport, the energy required to tr
ansport a mass of animal over a unit distance, with other animals showed th
at toads do not have a cheap form of terrestrial locomotion, but turtles do
; turtles use half the cost predicted from their body mass. This economy of
locomotion is consistent with what is known about turtle muscle, the mecha
nics of their gait, and the extremely long contact time for a limb with the
substrate. Swimming in toads is energetically expensive, whereas turtles,
on the basis of mass, use about the same energy to transport a unit mass as
an equivalent-size fish. The data were compared with the predictions of th
e Kram-Taylor hypothesis for locomotory scaling, and walking turtles were f
ound to provide a numerical fit. The data show that both terrestrial and aq
uatic locomotory energetics in toads are generally higher than predictions
on the basis of mass, whereas in turtles they are lower.