Background. Quit and Win '96 recruited 70,000 smokers in 25 countries. The
participants tried to abstain from smoking for at least 4 weeks. All partic
ipating countries followed the jointly agreed rules. Half of the countries
implemented the campaign nationally and half, regionally.
Methods. A 1-year follow-up study was conducted in the participating countr
ies. The aim of this study was to provide a standardized evaluation based o
n data from eight European campaign sites. Three measures were used to eval
uate the effectiveness of the campaigns. The first measure was the particip
ation rate, which is the proportion of participants among the smoking popul
ation targeted in each site. The second measure was a cautious estimate for
the continuous 1-year abstinence rate, which is the proportion of abstaine
rs among the follow-up sample regarding all nonrespondents as relapsed. Thi
rd was the measure of the population impact, which is the efficacy of the i
ntervention multiplied by its reach, where the efficacy equals the abstinen
ce rate and the reach equals the participation rate.
Results. The participation rates varied from 0.1 to 2%, being highest in No
rth Karelia, Finland, and Pitbkaranta, Russia. The abstinence rates varied
from 12 to 35%, being highest in Hungary, Ukraine, and Russia, where the pr
evalence of smoking is also relatively high. The population impacts varied
from 0.02 to 0.5%, being highest in Pitkaranta, where both the reach and th
e efficacy of the Quit and Win were relatively high.
Conclusions. There was great variation in effectiveness, with population im
pact being affected more by participation rate than abstinence rate. Quit a
nd Win contests are feasible interventions in diverse European populations.
To improve the effectiveness, future campaigns should increase the reach o
f the intervention, (C) 2000 American Health Foundation and Academic Press.