Minimally invasive direct cardiac massage versus closed-chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a porcine model of prolonged ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest
Ef. Paiva et al., Minimally invasive direct cardiac massage versus closed-chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a porcine model of prolonged ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest, RESUSCITAT, 47(3), 2000, pp. 287-299
Open chest cardiac massage has been shown to be superior to closed-chest ca
rdiopulmonary resuscitation for both hemodynamics produced during resuscita
tion and ultimate resuscitation success. The inexperience of many rescuers
with emergency thoracotomy, along with the associated morbidity contributes
to the continued reluctance in the use of invasive cardiopulmonary resusci
tation techniques. A device has been developed for performing 'minimally in
vasive' direct cardiac massage. This technique was compared to standard clo
sed-chest CPR for resuscitation results in 20 swine during prolonged ventri
cular fibrillation cardiac arrest. Minimally invasive direct cardiac massag
e was superior to closed-chest CPR for return of spontaneous circulation (7
/10 vs. 2/10; P < 0.02) and coronary perfusion pressure at 30 min of CPR (1
7 +/- 9 vs. 6 +/- 6 mmHg; P < 0.05). No significant injuries altering outco
me were found with the invasive device. Throughout most of the time course
of the study no significant differences in end-tidal expired carbon dioxide
levels were noted. Nor were there any differences in 24-h survival. Improv
ements in assuring proper placement of the device on the epicardium should
make this technique a potent advanced cardiac life support adjunct. (C) 200
0 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.