This article discusses xenotransplantation (XTP: the surgical use of nonhum
an tissues, organs, and cells for human transplantation) and examines the w
ay its scientific promoters have defended their technology against potentia
lly damaging public representations. The authors explore the criteria used
to legitimate the selection of the pig as the best species from which to "h
arvest" transplant tissues in the future. The authors' analysis shows that
scientists and medical practitioners routinely switch between scientific an
d cultural repertoires. These repertoires enable such actors to exchange ex
pert identities in scientific discourse for public identities in cultural d
iscourse. These discourses map onto similarities and differences between an
imal donors and human hosts. Finally, the case is used to comment on a numb
er of related approaches where the dynamics of medical and scientific autho
rity are discussed.