Income measures are increasingly used as an indicator of the well-being of
forest villagers, their use of forest products, and even the value of a for
est. The methods for estimating income are often underreported, however, an
d little analysis is available of the methods required to measure income. T
en case studies are examined to demonstrate methods in use for quantifying
household income. The cases are used to investigate techniques for overcomi
ng two common methodological obstacles: (1) the cost elf collecting data ab
out many: diverse and distant sources of income from the forest, and (2) th
e difficulty of aggregating the monetary values of products. The strengths
and weaknesses of the techniques are discussed to hell, researchers identif
y methods appropriate to their needs. The article concludes that (]) costs
are most effectively reduced where the number of products studied is limite
d and methods based on indirect observation are used; (2) aggregating the m
onetary value of a mix of market and subsistence products requires sensitiv
ity to the limitations of the methods; and (3) addressing the diversity of
values that forest products provide to people might provide a more accurate
estimation of income.