An important issue in the making of soil surveys is quantifying the value o
f the information generated and contained in the soil survey. This study us
es decision trees, Bayes' Theorem, and map quality evaluation procedures to
assess the economic value and economic efficiency of soil surveys. To deve
lop this methodology, a case study is used that considers three different s
cenarios in which the level of information regarding soil changes. The thre
e scenarios are: (i) site-specific soil information is unavailable, (ii) pe
rfect site-specific soil information is available (not realistic), and (iii
) imperfect site-specific soil information is available. The calculated eco
nomic value of this hypothetical soil survey was US$ 17.14 ha(-1) year(-1),
which is higher than the estimated soil survey cost of US$ 2.09 ha(-1). Th
is simple comparison indicates that the soil survey is cost effective and t
hat its costs would be paid off with the gain from the first year of its ap
plication. The combination of the calculated economic efficiency (55%) with
the physical quality of the map (total percent correct in the map was 80%)
allowed a better understanding of the actual value of the soil survey. The
use of this method provided a means of calculating analytically a more com
plex and realistic value of soil surveys.