DEVELOPMENT OF A PASSIVE SAMPLING TECHNIQUE FOR THE DETERMINATION OF NITROGEN-DIOXIDE AND SULFUR-DIOXIDE IN AMBIENT AIR

Citation
F. Desantis et al., DEVELOPMENT OF A PASSIVE SAMPLING TECHNIQUE FOR THE DETERMINATION OF NITROGEN-DIOXIDE AND SULFUR-DIOXIDE IN AMBIENT AIR, Analytica chimica acta, 346(1), 1997, pp. 127-134
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Chemistry Analytical
Journal title
ISSN journal
00032670
Volume
346
Issue
1
Year of publication
1997
Pages
127 - 134
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-2670(1997)346:1<127:DOAPST>2.0.ZU;2-3
Abstract
Since conventional badge-type samplers depend entirely on an empirical calibration against gas mixtures and use of the constant determined f or calculations, a system based on the use of two badge-type passive s amplers of different lengths has been studied for the determination of NO2 or SO2. The samplers make use of a filter membrane barrier to dam p out eddy motions and promote molecular diffusion from the ambient ai r to the trapping medium. The badges have a large ratio of cross-secti onal area to length of diffusion in order to increase sensitivity. Dif fusion theory applied to this configuration shows that the concentrati on results are independent of wind-flow velocity. The samplers have be en evaluated at different levels of relative humidity ranging from 0% to 90%. Batches of samplers were exposed for 48 h side-by-side with sa mplers exposed for consecutive periods of 24 h over the same interval. The results, expressed as a ratio (R) between the 48 h and the consec utive 24 h periods showed that the analytes collected (nitrite and sul phate) are stable (R=0.98+/-0.05 for nitrite and R=1.08+/-0.09 for sul phate). The detection limit attained (5 ppb of NO2 and 10 ppb of SO2 f or a 24 h sampling) is adequate for the determination in urban and rur al areas. The accuracy of the proposed method, expressed as percent re lative error, when compared to a standard denuder technique for NO2 an d SO2, was found to be better than about +/-10% with coefficient of va riation of 5.5% and 6.5%, respectively.