An economic assessment of weed control strategies in no-till glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max)

Citation
Cj. Swanton et al., An economic assessment of weed control strategies in no-till glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max), WEED TECH, 14(4), 2000, pp. 755-763
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Plant Sciences
Journal title
WEED TECHNOLOGY
ISSN journal
0890037X → ACNP
Volume
14
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
755 - 763
Database
ISI
SICI code
0890-037X(200010/12)14:4<755:AEAOWC>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
Applying glyphosate relative to the growth stage of soybean is important fo r maximizing weed control and profits in glyphosate-resistant soybean under no-till systems. A study was conducted in Ontario for 4 yr to evaluate the effectiveness and gross return on the timing and sequence of applications of glyphosate in glyphosate-resistant no-till soybean. Percent control of v arious weed species varied among years due to environmental conditions. Tim ing of glyphosate was critical relative to weed emergence and determined th e success of the treatment in terms of optimum soybean yield and gross retu rn. Soybean yield and gross return approximated that the critical period fo r weed control in glyphosate-resistant no-till soybean was the unifoliolate to the one- to three-trifoliolate stage. Sequential applications of glypho sate provided higher soybean yield and gross return than a single preplant application of glyphosate. Glyphosate applied preplant or at the unifoliola te stage followed by a second application at the one- to three-trifoliolate stage consistently provided maximum average soybean yield and gross return . Gross return of the sequential glyphosate treatments was also more consis tent across variable soybean price scenarios. Competition from uncontrolled later emerging weeds resulted in soybean yield loss with the single prepla nt application of glyphosate. Competition from uncontrolled early-emerging weeds reduced soybean yields when glyphosate was applied only at the one- t o three-trifoliolate stage of soybean. Overall, two weed control strategies were identified: (1) two applications of glyphosate, the first at preplant to the unifoliolate stage, followed by a second application at the one- to three-trifoliolate stage of soybean, (b) first application of glyphosate a t the unifoliolate stage followed by a second application at the one- to th ree-trifoliolate stage of soybean if later emerging weeds exceeded threshol d densities.