Adjuvant research contributes much to the knowledge and practice of weed sc
ience though the scientific process of systematically asking precise questi
ons and subsequently making distinctions among alternative explanations. Th
e purpose of adjuvant experimentation is to answer these questions and the
purpose of associated papers and presentations is to communicate the new in
formation. These purposes are self-evident, but are difficult to perfect. S
ome factors are particularly difficult for adjuvant researchers and require
that researchers plan thoroughly from the formulation of the experimental
question to final presentation of results. Adjuvant research requires both
chemical and biological expertise that is traditionally separated in most o
rganizations. Scientists from other disciplines or weed scientists not prim
arily concerned with adjuvants often direct adjuvant studies. This paper di
scusses mistakes that are commonly made in test design, interpretation, and
presentation and suggests guidelines to improve the quality of adjuvant re
search.