This review focuses on one aspect of moral judgment of aggression and viole
nt behavior in the context of the psychodynamics of everyday life: Judgment
al modularity. The central hypothesis asserts that, from the victim's persp
ective, the severity of judgments or the relative weight assigned to physic
al damage, when information on intent and damage is available, will be maxi
mized, whereas inverse trends will typify the judgments of the same person
from the assailant's perspective. This view resembles the spirit of the fun
ctional approach to moral judgment of violent behavior. In this light, rela
ted studies that were conducted within the framework of functional measurem
ent are reviewed. Judgmental modularity was documented in the majority of t
he findings. However, in two studies, the same participants exhibited judgm
ental consistency in the first phase and judgmental modularity in a second
phase, which manipulated other types of judgmental perspectives. Implicatio
ns for the issue of judgmental modularity, for the issue of modularity in v
iolent behavior and for a proposal to establish a functional definition of
aggression are discussed. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserve
d.