A comparison of methods for determining forest evapotranspiration and its components: sap-flow, soil water budget, eddy covariance and catchment water balance
Kb. Wilson et al., A comparison of methods for determining forest evapotranspiration and its components: sap-flow, soil water budget, eddy covariance and catchment water balance, AGR FOR MET, 106(2), 2001, pp. 153-168
A multi-year, multi-technique study was conducted to measure evapotranspira
tion and its components within an uneven-aged mixed deciduous forest in the
Southeastern United States. Four different measurement techniques were use
d, including soil water budget (1 year), sap flow (2 years), eddy covarianc
e (5 years), and catchment water budget (31 years). Annual estimates of eva
potranspiration were similar for the eddy covariance and catchment water ba
lance techniques, averaging 571 +/- 16 mm (eddy covariance) and 582 +/- 28
mm (catchment water balance) per year over a 5-year period. There were qual
itative similarities between sap flow and eddy covariance estimates on a da
ily basis, and sap flow estimates of transpiration were about 50% of annual
evapotranspiration estimated from eddy covariance and catchment studies. S
oil evaporation was estimated using a second eddy covariance system below t
he canopy, and these measurements suggest that soil evaporation explains on
ly a small portion of the difference between sap flow estimates of transpir
ation and eddy covariance and catchment water budget estimates of evapotran
spiration. Convergence of the catchment water balance and eddy covariance m
ethods and moderately good energy balance closure suggests that the sap flo
w estimates could be low, unless evaporation of canopy-intercepted water wa
s especially large. The large species diversity and presence of ring-porous
trees at our site may explain the difficulty in extrapolating sap flow mea
surements to the spatial scales representative of the eddy covariance and c
atchment water balance methods. Soil water budget estimates were positively
correlated with eddy covariance and sap flow measurements, but the data we
re highly variable and in error under conditions of severe surface dryness
and after rainfall events. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserv
ed.