Jc. Johnson et al., Lead exposure among workers renovating a previously deleaded bridge: Comparisons of trades, work tasks, AIHAJ, 61(6), 2000, pp. 815-819
Airborne and surface lead exposures were evaluated for construction trade g
roups at a previously deleaded bridge renovation site in the midwestern Uni
ted States. Although all lead-based paint should have been removed, old lay
ers of leaded paint were still present on some sections of the bridge. Iron
workers performing metal torch cutting had the highest exposures (188 mug/m
(3)), followed by workers engaged in clean-up operations and paint removal
(p < 0.001). Respirators were most frequently worn by workers with the grea
test lead exposures; however, laborers performing clean-up operations had e
xposures to lead dust of 43 <mu>g/m(3) and often wore no respiratory protec
tion. Wipe samples revealed that almost all contractor vehicles were contam
inated with lead. Heavy equipment operators with low airborne lead exposure
had the highest levels of surface contamination in personal vehicles (3600
mug/m(2)). Laborers cleaning structural steel with compressed air and iron
workers exposed to lead fumes from cutting had the highest concentrations o
f lead dust on clothing (mean 4766 mug/m(2)). Hand-washing facilities were
provided, but were infrequently used. No separate clothes changing facility
was available at the site. The potential for "take-home" contamination was
high, even though this site was thought to be relatively free of lead. Con
struction contractors and their workers need to be aware that previous dele
ading of a site may not preclude exposure to significant amounts of lead.