Gender differences in work-related injury/illness: Analysis of workers compensation claims

Citation
Ss. Islam et al., Gender differences in work-related injury/illness: Analysis of workers compensation claims, AM J IND M, 39(1), 2001, pp. 84-91
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Envirnomentale Medicine & Public Health
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL MEDICINE
ISSN journal
02713586 → ACNP
Volume
39
Issue
1
Year of publication
2001
Pages
84 - 91
Database
ISI
SICI code
0271-3586(200101)39:1<84:GDIWIA>2.0.ZU;2-5
Abstract
Background Risk of work-related injuries/illnesses among females has not be en well documented. This study compares compensable work-related injuries/i llnesses between females and males across all major industrial sectors and occupations using a state-managed Workers Compensation database. Methods Incidence rates were calculated by dividing the number of compensab le injuries/illnesses among West Virginia Workers Compensation claimants by the total number of female and male workers in each specific industry clas s (based on SIC codes). Gender-specific denominators for occupations were e stimated using 1990 U.S. Census data. Results The overall injury/illness rate was significantly lower in females than males (5.5 vs. 11.5 per 100 employees), a trend that extended to all m ajor industrial classes with the exception of service and agricultural sect ors. The distribution of types of injury/illness varied by gender occupatio n, and industry with significantly higher risk of carpal tunnel syndrome, b urn, sprain, and fracture in females compared to males. Conclusions Female workers have a greater risk of specific injury/illness c ompared to males in various industries. Further research will be needed to understand the role of differential job-tasks within each occupation in exp laining the risk difference. Am. J. Ind. Med. 39:84-91, 2001. (C) 2001 Wile y-Liss, Inc.