Background: Gastric neuroendocrine (or gastric carcinoid) tumors have recen
tly been classified into 3 types that differ in biological behavior and pro
gnosis. Although the necessity of type-adapted treatment is widely accepted
, it seems inconsistently used in daily practice.
Hypothesis: Diagnostic differentiation into various biological types is nec
essary for an adequate treatment of gastric neuroendocrine tumors.
Design: Retrospective study.
Setting: University hospital department of surgery.
Patients: Twenty-seven patients with a histologically verified gastric neur
oendocrine tumor.
Main Outcome Measures: A univariate analysis of survival rates with respect
to tumor type, tumor biological parameters, and treatment performed was ac
complished by applying the Kaplan-Meier estimation method. The log-rank tes
t was used to evaluate the level of significance.
Results: The 16 type 1 (59%) and 11 type 3 (41%) gastric neuroendocrine tum
ors differ in tumor size, histopathologic characteristics, and biological b
ehavior. Nine (56%) of 16 type 1 gastric neuroendocrine tumors were treated
by local excision, 8 of these (89%) had persistent atrophic gastropathy du
ring the follow-up period. Five-year cumulative survival of patients with t
ype 1 gastric neuroendocrine tumor was 100% without any progression into ma
lignant phenotype. In contrast, 4 (44%) of 9 locally advanced type 3 gastri
c neuroendocrine tumors were treated radically by extended resection with a
5-year cumulative survival of 75%.
Conclusions: Differentiation into 3 biologically distinct tumor types for g
astric neuroendocrine tumors is important with respect to therapeutic strat
egy and prognostic consideration. Correct diagnosis is attainable by using
endoscopy, histopathologic characteristics, and laboratory chemical analysi
s and should precede any treatment. Extended radical surgery of high-risk t
ype 3 tumors is indicated when definitive healing is achievable, whereas ty
pe 1 tumors are best treated by endoscopic removal and long-term follow-up.