A total of 16 boundary layer (BL) DMS flux values were derived from fights
over the Southern Ocean. DMS flux values were derived from airborne observa
tions recorded during the Aerosol Characterization Experiment (ACE I). The
latitude range covered was 55 degreesS-40 degreesS. The method of evaluatio
n was based on the mass-balance photochemical-modeling (MBPCM) approach. Th
e estimated flux for the above latitude range was 0.4-7.0 mu mol m(-2) d(-1
). The average value from all data analyzed was 2.6 +/- 1.8 mu mol m(-2) d(
-1). A comparison of the MBPCM methodology with several other DMS flux meth
ods (e.g., ship and airborne based) revealed reasonably good agreement in s
ome cases and significant disagreement in other cases. Considering the limi
ted number of cases compared and the fact that conditions for the compariso
ns were far from ideal, it is not possible to conclude that major agreement
or differences have been established between these methods. A major result
from this study was the finding that DMS oxidation is a major source of BL
SO2 over the Southern Ocean. Model simulations suggest that, on average, t
he conversion efficiency is 0.7 or higher, given a lifetime for SO2 of simi
lar to 1d. A comparison of two sulfur case studies, one based on DMS-SO2 da
ta generated on the NCAR C-130 aircraft, the other based on data recorded o
n the NOAA ship Discoverer, revealed qualitative agreement in finding that
DMS was a major source of Southern Ocean SO2. On the other hand, significan
t disagreement was found regarding the DMS/SO2 conversion efficiency (e.g.,
0.3-0.5 versus 0.7-0.9). Although yet unknown factors, such as vertical mi
xing, may be involved in reducing the level of disagreement, it does appear
at this time that some significant portion of this difference may be relat
ed to systematic differences in the two different techniques employed to me
asure SO2. It would seem prudent, therefore, that further instrument interc
omparison SO2 studies be considered. It also would be desirable to stage ne
w intercomparison activity between the MBPCM flux approach and the air-to-s
ea gradient as well as other flux methods, but under far more favorable con
ditions. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.