Energy cost of physical task performance in men and women wearing chemicalprotective clothing

Citation
Mm. Murphy et al., Energy cost of physical task performance in men and women wearing chemicalprotective clothing, AVIAT SP EN, 72(1), 2001, pp. 25-31
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Envirnomentale Medicine & Public Health","Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
AVIATION SPACE AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE
ISSN journal
00956562 → ACNP
Volume
72
Issue
1
Year of publication
2001
Pages
25 - 31
Database
ISI
SICI code
0095-6562(200101)72:1<25:ECOPTP>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
Background: Chemical protective clothing (CPC) is required to perform certa in occupations and is known to inhibit physical performance. Few data are a vailable that quantify the physiological response of men and women during t ask performance while wearing CPC. Hypothesis: The mobility of a taste will have a significant effect on the change in energy cost. The energy cost of wearing CPC will be greater in women than men during physical task perform ance. Methods: Energy cost ((V) over dot o(2)) and the psychophysical scale s, rating of perceived exertion (RPE) and respiratory distress (RD), were m easured in 32 men and 26 women during the performance of 31 physical tasks. Tasks were categorized by mobility: stationary, intermittent or continuous . Between 6-12 men and 5-13 women conducted each task wearing 2 clothing co nditions: battle-dress uniform (BDU, wt = 3.7 kg) and (CPC, wt = 9.3 kg). R esults: (V) over dot o(2) L . min(-1), was higher in CPC compared with BDU for the continuous task category fur both genders. However, when (V) over d ot o(2) (ml . kg(-1) clothed wt min(-1)) was normalized for clothing weight , there remained a significant clothing effect fur the continuous category, but there were no gender differences. (V) over dot o(2), expressed as % (V ) over dot o(2)max, was significantly increased for BDU compared with CPC F or the continuous task category only. This difference was significantly gre ater For women than men. Women exercised at a higher % (V) over dot o(2)max and reported a higher RPE than men for all categories in both BDU and CPC. Both genders reported higher RD wearing CPC for the continuous task catego ry only. Conclusions: There is an increase in energy cost wearing CPC durin g continuous tasks which can be attributed to both the clothing weight and the hobbling effect. Wearing CPC is more physiologically and psychologicall y demanding for women than men, especially when performing tasks of a conti nuous nature.