Background: Chemical protective clothing (CPC) is required to perform certa
in occupations and is known to inhibit physical performance. Few data are a
vailable that quantify the physiological response of men and women during t
ask performance while wearing CPC. Hypothesis: The mobility of a taste will
have a significant effect on the change in energy cost. The energy cost of
wearing CPC will be greater in women than men during physical task perform
ance. Methods: Energy cost ((V) over dot o(2)) and the psychophysical scale
s, rating of perceived exertion (RPE) and respiratory distress (RD), were m
easured in 32 men and 26 women during the performance of 31 physical tasks.
Tasks were categorized by mobility: stationary, intermittent or continuous
. Between 6-12 men and 5-13 women conducted each task wearing 2 clothing co
nditions: battle-dress uniform (BDU, wt = 3.7 kg) and (CPC, wt = 9.3 kg). R
esults: (V) over dot o(2) L . min(-1), was higher in CPC compared with BDU
for the continuous task category fur both genders. However, when (V) over d
ot o(2) (ml . kg(-1) clothed wt min(-1)) was normalized for clothing weight
, there remained a significant clothing effect fur the continuous category,
but there were no gender differences. (V) over dot o(2), expressed as % (V
) over dot o(2)max, was significantly increased for BDU compared with CPC F
or the continuous task category only. This difference was significantly gre
ater For women than men. Women exercised at a higher % (V) over dot o(2)max
and reported a higher RPE than men for all categories in both BDU and CPC.
Both genders reported higher RD wearing CPC for the continuous task catego
ry only. Conclusions: There is an increase in energy cost wearing CPC durin
g continuous tasks which can be attributed to both the clothing weight and
the hobbling effect. Wearing CPC is more physiologically and psychologicall
y demanding for women than men, especially when performing tasks of a conti
nuous nature.