The present research sought to establish a reliable and valid instrument fo
r assessing the relevance of neoconditioning factors (e.g. latent inhibitio
n, UCS inflation/revaluation, prior fear levels, prior expectancies of harm
, fear and pain levels experienced during supposed learning events), in the
development of human fear. Fifty-four undergraduate height-fearful student
s completed the new origins instrument (OQ-II), while 54 matched controls c
ompleted a modified version (OQM-II) that examined their prior experiences
with heights. In general, few differences between groups were found, Height
-fearful and control subjects did not differ on trait anxiety, the frequenc
y of negative encounters with heights, the age at which these events had oc
curred, prior fear levels, prior expectancies of harm, or reports of UCS in
flation/revaluation procedures. However, in a finding directly opposite to
that expected from a conditioning account, the mean fear and pain scores re
ported by subjects who had experienced direct conditioning events were sign
ificantly higher in the non-fearful group than in the height-fearful group.
These findings are discussed in terms of associative and non-associative m
odels of fear. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.