Rats, like other crepuscular animals, have excellent auditory capacities an
d they discriminate well between different sounds [Heffner HE, Heffner RS,
Hearing in two cricetid rodents: wood rats (Neotoma floridana) and grasshop
per mouse (Onychomys leucogaster). J Comp Psychol 1985;99(3):275-88]. Howev
er, most experimental literature concerning spatial orientation almost excl
usively emphasizes the use of visual landmarks [Cressant A, Muller RU, Pouc
et B. Failure of centrally placed objects to control the firing fields of h
ippocampal place cells. J Neurosci 1997;17(7):2531-42; and Goodridge JP, Ta
ube JS. Preferential use of the landmark navigational system by head direct
ion cells in rats. Behav Neurosci 1995;109(1):49-61]. To address the import
ant issue of whether rats are able to achieve a place navigation task relat
ive to auditory beacons, we designed a place learning task in the water maz
e. We controlled cue availability by conducting the experiment in total dar
kness. Three auditory cues did not allow place navigation whereas three vis
ual cues in the same positions did support place navigation. One auditory b
eacon directly associated with the goal location did not support taxon navi
gation (a beacon strategy allowing the animal to find the goal just by swim
ming toward the cue). Replacing the auditory beacons by one single visual b
eacon did support taxon navigation. A multimodal configuration of two audit
ory cues and one visual cue allowed correct place navigation. The deletion
of the two auditory or of the one visual cue did disrupt the spatial perfor
mance. Thus rats can combine information from different sensory modalities
to achieve a place navigation task. In particular, auditory cues support pl
ace navigation when associated with a visual one. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science
B.V. All rights reserved.