A comparison of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, autologous bone marrow transplantation, and aggressive chemotherapy in children with acute myeloid leukemia in remission: a report from the Children's Cancer Group
Wg. Woods et al., A comparison of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, autologous bone marrow transplantation, and aggressive chemotherapy in children with acute myeloid leukemia in remission: a report from the Children's Cancer Group, BLOOD, 97(1), 2001, pp. 56-62
Intensive, myelosuppressive therapy is necessary to maximize outcomes for p
atients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), A comparison was made of 3 aggre
ssive postremission approaches for children and adolescents with AML in a r
andomized trial, CCG-2891,A total of 652 children and adolescents with AML
who achieved remission on 2 induction regimens using identical drugs end do
ses (standard and intensive timing) were eligible for allocation to allogen
eic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) based on matched related donor status
(n = 181) or randomization to autologous BMT (n = 177) or to aggressive hi
gh-dose cytarabine-based chemotherapy (n = 179). Only 115 patients (18%) re
fused to participate in the postremission phase of this study. Overall comp
liance with the 3 allocated regimens was 90%, At 8 years actuarial, 54% +/-
4%(95% confidence interval) of all remission patients remain alive. Surviv
al by assigned regimen ("intent to treat") is as follows: allogeneic BMT, 6
0% +/- 9%; autologous BMT, 48% +/- 8%; and chemotherapy, 53% +/- 8%, Surviv
al in the allogeneic BMT group is significantly superior to autologous BMT
(P = .002) and chemotherapy (P = .05); differences between chemotherapy and
autologous BMT are not significant (P = .21). No potential confounding fac
tors affected results. Patients receiving intensive-timing induction therap
y had superior long-term survival irrespective of postremission regimen rec
eived (allogeneic BMT, 70% +/- 9%; autologous BMT, 54% +/- 9%; chemotherapy
, 57% +/- 10%), Allogeneic BMT remains the treatment of choice for children
and adolescents with AML in remission, when a matched related donor is ava
ilable. For all others, there is no advantage to autologous BMT; hence, agg
ressive nonablative chemotherapy should be used. (C) 2001 by The American S
ociety of Hematology.