According to the 'developmental constraint hypothesis' of comparative mamma
lian neuroanatomy, brain growth follows predictable allometric trends. Ther
efore, brain structures should scale to the entire brain in the same way ac
ross mammals. Evidence for a departure from this pattern for cerebellum vol
ume has recently been reported among the anthropoid primates. One of the ma
mmalian groups that has been neglected in tests of the 'developmental const
raint hypothesis' is the cetaceans (dolphins, whales, and porpoises). Becau
se many cetaceans possess relative brain sizes in the range of primates com
parative tests of the 'developmental constraint hypothesis' across these tw
o groups could help to delineate the parameters of this hypothesis. In this
paper, we compare relative cerebellum volumes in two cetacean species, the
bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) and the common dolphin (Delphinus
delphis) with published data from anthropoid primates. We found that relati
ve cerebellum size is significantly greater in the two dolphin species than
in any of the primates, including humans. These results suggest that there
is possibly expansion of brain structures independent of strictly allometr
ic processes. Copyright (C) 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel.