Phase I/II study of intravenous nedaplatin and intraarterial cisplatin with transcatheter arterial embolization for patients with locally advanced uterine cervical carcinoma

Citation
S. Adachi et al., Phase I/II study of intravenous nedaplatin and intraarterial cisplatin with transcatheter arterial embolization for patients with locally advanced uterine cervical carcinoma, CANC CYTOP, 91(1), 2001, pp. 74-79
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Journal title
CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY
ISSN journal
0008543X → ACNP
Volume
91
Issue
1
Year of publication
2001
Pages
74 - 79
Database
ISI
SICI code
0008-543X(20010101)91:1<74:PISOIN>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
BACKGROUND. Nedaplatin, a platinum analog with less renal toxicity and simi lar efficacy for cervical carcinoma, recently has been shown to have a syne rgistic effect on cervical carcinoma lines in combination with cisplatin. T o determine the clinical efficacy of this combination in patients with cerv ical carcinoma, the authors conducted a Phase I/II study of intravenous ned aplatin and intraarterial cisplatin combined with transcatheter arterial em bolization (TAE). METHODS. Eligibility criteria were as follows: cervical carcinoma (Stages I B2-IV; International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics), 16-70 years of age, performance status between 0 and 2, and adequate bone marrow, renal , and hepatic function. Nedaplatin (40-70 mg/m(2)) was administered intrave nously on Day 1 followed by intraarterial administration of cisplatin (70 m g/m(2)) on Day 3 via both uterine arteries by using the Seldinger method. T his then was followed by TAE. This course of treatment was repeated every 3 weeks for 3 cycles. RESULTS. Patient data were as follows: age 37-68 (median, 55 years) and Sta ges IB2:4, IIA:3, IIB:2, IIIA:1, IIIB:3, IVA:2 carcinoma. The response to t herapy was defined by magnetic resonance imaging as follows: partial respon se in 60% (9 of 15) of patients, complete response in 40% (6 of 15) of pati ents, and an overall response rate of 100% (95% confidence interval, 78-100 %). Myelosuppression was manageable. Grade 3/4 renal toxicity was observed in 2 patients who received 70 mg/m(2) of nedaplatin. Thirteen patients rece ived radical hysterectomy, 1 patient received lymph node sampling, and 11 p atients received adjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS. The maximum tolerable dose was 70 mg/m(2) nedaplatin, and the dose-limiting toxicity was renal toxicity. The recommended dose was 60 mg/m (2) nedaplatin intravenously followed by 70 mg/m(2) cisplatin intraarterial ly. Intravenous nedaplatin followed by intraarterial cisplatin with TAE; ap pears to be very effective for locally advanced cervical carcinoma. Cancer 2001;91:74-9. (C) 2001 American Cancer Society.