Landscape sensitivity may be discussed in terms of the response of landscap
e systems to perturbation on different time and spatial scales. Unstable sy
stems behave chaotically bur may show self organised criticality, while sta
ble systems resist change until threshold values of system parameters ale e
xceeded. Spatial sensitivity is expressed in different rates of change, bet
ween landscape components or elements. This leads to divergence between lan
dscape elements, and the inheritance of palaeoforms in present-day landscap
e mosaics. Temporal sensitivity reflects the magnitude and frequency of ind
ividual events nested within patterns of longer term environmental changes
occurring on different timescales. The resulting landscape complexity refle
cts the spatio-temporal sensitivity of earth surface systems over ten order
s of scale magnitude. The connectivity within landscapes ensures that site
instabilities can be propagated within multievent feedback systems. Landsca
pes record their own histories in sediments and soils, but interpretation o
f event stratigraphy may not be straightforward, while soil profiles can ab
sorb individual events without erosion. Although we are increasingly able t
o model the present, environmental management is dominantly about conservin
g inherited properties of landscapes: forests, soils, floodplains, coastlin
es. Landscape sensitivity for landscape management must, therefore, address
not only active, largely nonlinear, environmental systems, but also the mo
saics and palimpsests that are the inheritance from past environments. (C)
2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.