Jc. Fleishaker, Clinical pharmacokinetics of reboxetine, a selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor for the treatment of patients with depression, CLIN PHARMA, 39(6), 2000, pp. 413-427
Reboxetine is a novel selective norepinephrine inhibitor that has been eval
uated in the treatment of patients with depression.
Reboxetine is a racemic mixture, and the (S,S)-(+)-enantiomer appears to be
the more potent inhibitor. However, the ratio of the areas under the conce
ntration-time curves of the (S,S)-(+)- and (R,R)-(-)-enantiomers in vivo is
approximately 0.5. There is no evidence for chiral inversion. Differences
in the clearances of the 2 enantiomers may be explained by differences in p
rotein binding.
The pharmacokinetics of reboxetine are linear following both single and mul
tiple oral doses up to a dosage of 12 mg/day, The plasma concentration-time
profile following oral administration is best described by a 1-compartment
model, and the mean half-life (approximately 12 hours) is consistent with
the recommendation to administer the drug twice daily.
Reboxetine is well absorbed after oral administration. The absolute bioavai
lability is 94.5%, and maximal concentrations are generally achieved within
2 to 4 hours. Food affects the rate, but not the extent, of absorption. Th
e distribution of reboxetine appears to be limited to a fraction of the tot
al body water due to its extensive (>97%) binding to plasma proteins.
The primary route of reboxetine elimination appears to be through hepatic m
etabolism. Less than 10% of the dose is cleared renally. A number of metabo
lites formed through hepatic oxidation have been identified, but reboxetine
is the major circulating species in plasma. III vitro studies show that re
boxetine is predominantly metabolised by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4; CYP2D6
is not involved.
Reboxetine plasma concentrations are increased in elderly individuals and i
n those with hepatic or renal dysfunction, probably because of reduced meta
bolic clearance. In these populations, reboxetine should be used with cauti
on, and a dosage reduction is indicated.
Ketoconazole decreases the clearance of reboxetine, so that the dosage of r
eboxetine may need to be reduced when potent inhibitors of CYP3A4 are coadm
inistered. Quinidine does not affect the in vitro clearance of reboxetine,
confirming the lack of involvement of CYP2D6. There is no pharmacokinetic i
nteraction between reboxetine and lorazepam or fluoxetine. Reboxetine at th
erapeutic concentrations has no effect on the in vitro activity of CYP1A2,
2C9, 2D6, 2E1 or 3A4. The lack of effect of reboxetine on CYP2D6 and CYP3A4
was confirmed by the lack of effect on the metabolism of dextromethorphan
and alprazolam in healthy volunteers. Thus, reboxetine is not likely to aff
ect the clearance of other drugs metabolised by CYP isozymes.