REFINEMENT OF IMPACT ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGIES TO SOLVE THE GLOBAL-DOUBLE-LEFT-RIGHT-ARROW-LOCAL CONTROVERSY IN PRODUCT LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT - RELAIS TYPE MICRO-A AS AN EXAMPLE FOR A LONG-LIVED PRODUCT
M. Herrchen et al., REFINEMENT OF IMPACT ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGIES TO SOLVE THE GLOBAL-DOUBLE-LEFT-RIGHT-ARROW-LOCAL CONTROVERSY IN PRODUCT LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT - RELAIS TYPE MICRO-A AS AN EXAMPLE FOR A LONG-LIVED PRODUCT, Chemosphere, 35(1-2), 1997, pp. 391-404
For most life-cycle impact assessments global-type stressors only are
selected and organized into the respective impact categories, mainly d
ue to the fact, that the life-cycle inventory results in aggregated in
formation an loadings but not on site-specific concentrations. With re
spect to the local-type impact category ''ecotoxicity'' two differentl
y in-depth approaches have been developed: The screening approach resu
lts in potential ecological loadings. The in-depth approach additional
ly analyses the character of emission sources and uses a scoring syste
m for the effects assessment. A second local double left right arrow g
lobal problem might arise when assessing long-lived products. They oft
en comprise global-type, unspecific and also specific-type, geographic
ally defined stages along their life-cycle. Possibilities and limitati
ons in aggregating the results from both types - also accounting for s
everal LCA applications such as product comparison and identification
of improvement options - are presented. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd.