A recent Law Commission Consultation Paper has reconsidered the double jeop
ardy rule. The Paper recommends, inter alia, the enactment of a new excepti
on to the rule to allow for a ri trial where significant new evidence of gu
ilt emerges after acquittal. This article reviews the Commission's proposal
s and finds them justified, but argues that there is a need to rethink some
of the details of the proposed exception.