Two main cold hardiness strategies of insects - freeze tolerance in some sp
ecies, and overwintering in a supercooled state without tolerance of freezi
ng in many others - were recently reclassified. However, I present several
problems with the current systems. My suggested classification is based on
clearer definitions of the causes of cold injury. I recognize three main mo
rtality factors: freezing of body liquids, cold shock, and cumulative chill
injury. Presence or absence of each of these factors produce eight combina
tions. I have named the eight classes after Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs
to avoid nomenclatural confusion. Some of these classes are probably not u
sed as tactics against cold injury by any insect species. Other classes con
tain so many species that they might be reclassified in more detail, using
values of supercooling point and other quantitative parameters. However, wi
dely comparable parameters, like the upper limit of cold injury zone and th
e sum of injurious temperatures are still rarely published, thus we still l
ack comprehensive data for multivariate analyses. Every cold hardiness stra
tegy should be characterized by a meaningful class or subclass together wit
h the physiological, biochemical, and behavioural mechanisms employed by th
e insects. I also point out the existence of strategies that combine two ta
ctics - either a switching strategy (during preparation for winter, populat
ion "chooses" which tactic will be used), or a dual strategy (individuals a
re ready to use one of the tactics depending on the prevailing environmenta
l conditions).