Statistical estimators of the concentrations associated with specified leve
ls of reproductive toxicity in the aquatic organism Ceriodaphnia dubia are
presented and compared. The first estimator, the ICp or inhibition concentr
ation approach, was based on a nonparametric estimation routine that assume
d responses monotonically declined with increasing concentrations. This est
imator also assumed that linear interpolation between mean responses associ
ated with consecutive concentration groups was reasonable. The second estim
ator, the RIp or reproductive inhibition concentration approach, was based
on a parametric concentration-response model. This model assumed that the n
umber of young is a Poisson or negative, binomially distributed, random var
iable, and that the mean number of young could be modeled using an exponent
ial term involving a polynomial in the test concentrations. Confidence inte
rvals for both these estimators were obtained using variants of a bootstrap
resampling procedure. The properties of these estimators, namely bias, mea
n squared error, and coverage probabilities, were compared in a Monte Carlo
simulation study. The results from this study suggested that over a broad
range of realistic conditions, the confidence intervals associated with the
ICp estimator failed to maintain nominal coverage probabilities, whereas t
he confidence intervals associated with the RIp estimator performed as nomi
nally stated under most conditions. Finally, correct specification of the m
odel concentration-response pattern was observed to be important for estima
ting inhibition concentrations with small bias and variability.