This review critically evaluates the strategies for selection of salt toler
ant woody Australian species for land reclamation. There is evidence that i
n selecting material to screen, provenances from saline areas will show hig
her levels of salt tolerance than those from non-saline areas. However, the
re are sufficient numbers of exceptions to justify inclusion in trials of s
ome material from non-saline areas. Because of the complexity and long term
nature of field trials, large numbers of species and provenances have been
screened as juvenile plants (up to 1 year old) in the glasshouse. For very
few of these, has the match between performance in glasshouse and field be
en checked. In Eucalyptus, the genus for which most species have been scree
ned, the assessment of salinity tolerance is the same in the field and glas
shouse for 20 species, three appear more tolerant in the field than the gla
sshouse and five are less tolerant in the field than would be expected from
glasshouse results. For 13 eucalypt species there are conflicting results
between different glasshouse and/or field trials. A similar picture emerges
for Melaleuca, Acacia and Casuarina though in these genera fewer species h
ave been tested in both glasshouse and field. Glasshouse trials have a role
where specific information is needed from juvenile plants such as the abil
ity of a species to exclude salt from the leaves, or performance under cont
rolled conditions of waterlogging or saline waterlogging. However, as the o
bjective of most experiments is to identify superior salt tolerant lines fo
r the field, despite the complexity and cost, well designed and monitored f
ield trials are the ultimate test. Researchers are also encouraged to consi
der inclusion of appropriate standard lines of Eucalyptus camaldulensis and
E. occidentalis to enable better comparisons between trials. (C) 2000 Else
vier Science B.V. All rights reserved.