Ninety-five freshmen each recruited three peers to play a "group bidding ga
me," an N-person prisoner's dilemma in which anyone could win movie tickets
depending on their scores in the game. Prior to playing, all participants
completed a measure of prosocial value orientation. Replicating and extendi
ng: earlier findings (Sheldon and McGregor 2000), our results show that pro
social participants were at a disadvantage within groups. Despite this vuln
erability, prosocial participants did no worse overall than asocial partici
pants because a counteracting group-level advantage arose for prosocials, w
ho tended to be concentrated in groups. Implications of this assortative pr
ofess for the egoism/altruism debate, and for hierarchical selection theory
, are discussed.