The introduction of competition forces regulators to address the historical
practice of using of implicit cross subsidies to maintain uniformly low lo
cal telephone service rates. The Federal Communications Commission recently
adopted rules to remove a portion of these implicit subsidies by adopting
an explicit universal service program. This program, however, only addresse
s a small portion of the problem and leaves to the states problems associat
ed with intrastate cross subsidies. In this paper we examine several altern
ative universal service programs that states may adopt. Overall, we find th
at universal service programs that base subsidy dollars on the cost of prov
iding service have little effect on telephone penetration rates acid result
in large taxes, which distort market outcomes and drive those paying into
the system from the network. Large universal service programs also cause co
mpetitive distortions. Furthermore, we find that cost-based mechanisms do a
n equally poor job when we use normative criteria, such as the effect the p
rograms have on the distribution of income. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V.
All rights reserved.