Responses of the skin microcirculation to acetylcholine and to sodium nitroprusside in chronic uremic patients

Citation
A. Cupisti et al., Responses of the skin microcirculation to acetylcholine and to sodium nitroprusside in chronic uremic patients, INT J CL L, 30(3), 2000, pp. 157-162
Citations number
37
Categorie Soggetti
Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL & LABORATORY RESEARCH
ISSN journal
09405437 → ACNP
Volume
30
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
157 - 162
Database
ISI
SICI code
0940-5437(200009)30:3<157:ROTSMT>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to assess the endothelial function of the microcirculation in chronic renal failure. We investigated the responses of the cutaneous blood flow to locally delivered acetylcholine and sodium nit roprusside in uremic patients. The study included 60 chronic uremic patient s: 40 patients with a creatinine clearance of 4-25 ml/min were on conservat ive treatment and 20 patients were on maintenance hemodialysis. The changes in skin blood flow following iontophoretic delivery of acetylcholine (an e ndothelium-dependent vasodilator) and sodium nitroprusside (an endothelium- independent vasodilator) were measured by laser Doppler flowmetry. Acetylch oline induced a progressive increase in blood flow in both groups, reaching approximately 100% of the maximal hyperemic response obtained by sodium ni troprusside delivery. The percent increase in blood flow from baseline was lower in hemodialysis patients than in patients on conservative treatment, after both acetylcholine (550+/-44 vs. 718+/-61%, P<0.05) and sodium nitrop russide (553+/-46 vs. 735+/-69%, P<0.05) delivery. In the hemodialysis grou p, the hyperemic responses to acetylcholine and sodium nitroprusside did no t improve after the hemodialysis session. Hence, the hyperemic responses of the skin microcirculation are lower in hemodialysis patients than in patie nts on conservative treatment, and did not ameliorate after hemodialysis. I t seems to be independent of endothelial dysfunction, and associated with t he severity of uremia and with the maintenance hemodialysis treatment. This microcirculatory abnormality is in keeping with the arterial stiffness and vascular wall damages described in dialysis patients, which contribute to the cardiovascular morbidity of chronic uremia.