Five experiments are reported showing that the interpretation of personally
relevant emotional information can be modified by systematic exposure to c
ongruent exemplars. Participants were induced to interpret ambiguous inform
ation in a relatively threatening or a benign way. Comparison with a baseli
ne condition suggested that negative and positive induction had similar but
opposing effects. Induction of an interpretative bias did not require acti
ve generation of personally relevant meanings, but such active processing w
as necessary before state anxiety changed in parallel with the induced inte
rpretative bias. These findings provide evidence consistent with a causal l
ink between the deployment of interpretative bias and anxiety and reveal so
mething of the processes underlying this association.