Hr. Wettstein et al., Influence of plant lecithin partly replacing rumen-protected fat on digestion, metabolic traits and performance of dairy cows, J ANIM PHYS, 84(5), 2000, pp. 165-177
Citations number
39
Categorie Soggetti
Veterinary Medicine/Animal Health
Journal title
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL PHYSIOLOGY AND ANIMAL NUTRITION-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR TIERPHYSIOLOGIE TIERERNAHRUNG UND FUTTERMITTELKUNDE
Nutrient digestibility, metabolic effects and performance were evaluated in
lactating cows (n = 6 x 6) receiving diets containing one of four differen
t lecithins (raw, deoiled and deoiled/partially hydrolysed sop lecithin, ra
w canola lecithin) or soybean oil in combination with Ca soaps of palm oil
fatty acids in a ratio of 1 : 3. A diet supplemented only with Ca soaps ser
ved as a control. The complete diets consisted of forage and concentrate (0
.62 : 0.38) and total lipid supplementation was 30 g fatty acids/kg dietary
dry matter. Lecithins had no effect on milk yield and milk composition. Ap
parent digestibility of dry matter, organic matter and gross energy were hi
ghest in the control diet and lowest in the soybean oil diet (p <0.1) with
intermediate values for the lecithin-supplemented diets. Soybean oil partic
ularly reduced fibre digestibility (significant with hemicellulose), wherea
s this effect was reduced or even missing when lecithins, particularly raw
canola lecithin and deoiled/hydrolysed soy lecithin, were used. The digesti
bility of total fatty acids was not affected by the treatments. The effects
were also not significant for blood plasma traits except for insulin which
was significantly higher with raw than with deoiled/hydrolysed soy lecithi
n. In conclusion, lecithins, particularly those technologically modified or
of a low polyenoic fatty acid content, might be preferred to oils when use
d as an energy source whereas they failed to improve digestibility of rumen
-protected fats.