I argue that hazard models are more appropriate than single-period models f
or forecasting bankruptcy. Single-period models are inconsistent, while haz
ard models produce consistent estimates. I describe a simple technique for
estimating a discrete-time hazard model. I find that about half of the acco
unting ratios that have been used in previous models are not statistically
significant. Moreover, market size, past stock returns, and idiosyncratic r
eturns variability are all strongly related to bankruptcy. I propose a mode
l that uses both accounting ratios and market-driven variables to produce o
ut-of-sample forecasts that are more accurate than those of alternative mod
els.