Evaluation of the cardiovascular responses to fiberoptic orotracheal intubation with television monitoring: Comparison with conventional direct laryngoscopy
Yu. Adachi et al., Evaluation of the cardiovascular responses to fiberoptic orotracheal intubation with television monitoring: Comparison with conventional direct laryngoscopy, J CLIN ANES, 12(7), 2000, pp. 503-508
Study Objective: To evaluate and compare cardiovascular responses to a new
method of orotracheal intubation incorporating TV monitoring, with conventi
onal orotracheal intubation via rigid blade laryngoscopy.
Design: Prospective single-blind study.
Setting: Operating room of a medical college hospital.
Patients: 90 ASA physical status I and II surgical patients requiring gener
al anesthesia and orotracheal intubation.
Interventions: Patients were randomly allocated to two groups, one for the
new intubation method and the other for conventional intubation using a rig
id laryngoscope. In the new method, an anesthesiologist inserted an endotra
cheal tube alone into the trachea via TV monitoring through the bronchoscop
e, which was inserted by an assistant through the mouth to the middle laryn
x. The patient's trachea was intubated without extreme stretching of laryng
eal tissues or deep insertion of the tip of the bronchoscope. In the conven
tional method, orotracheal intubation was performed with rigid direct laryn
goscopy.
Measurements: Noninvasive blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) were meas
ured before arrival at the operating room, and before and after orotracheal
intubation.
Main Results: Although this method was expected to be a minimally invasive
fiberoptic intubation technique, the patients showed significant increases
in BP and HR. No significant differences between the two groups were observ
ed in cardiovascular responses immediately after intubation: the systolic B
P, 169.5 +/- 28.3 versus 167.0 +/- 23.1 mmHg, and HR, 100.2 +/- 18.2 versus
98.8 +/- 16.6 bpm.
Conclusions: Insertion of an endotracheal tube may itself be the most invas
ive stimulus during intubation procedures. (C) 2000 by Elsevier Science Inc
.