Ja. Clark et al., Living with treatment decisions: Regrets and quality of life among men treated for metastatic prostate cancer, J CL ONCOL, 19(1), 2001, pp. 72-80
Purpose: To examine variation in men's long-term regret of treatment decisi
ons, ie, surgical versus chemical castration, for metastatic prostate cance
r and its associations with quality of life.
Methods: Survey of previously treated patients to assess treatment decision
s and quality of life, supplemented with focus groups. Two items addressing
whether a patient wished he could change his mind and the belief that he w
ould have been better off with the treatment not chosen were combined in cl
assifying survey respondents as either satisfied or regretful. chi (2) and
t tests were used to test associations between regret and treatment history
, complications, and quality of life.
Results: Survey respondents included 201 men aged 45 to 93 years (median, 7
1 years), who had begun treatment (71% chemical castration, 29% orchiectomy
) a median of 2 years previously, Most reported complications: hot flashes
(70%), nausea (34%), and erectile dysfunction (81%). Most were satisfied wi
th the treatment decision, but 23% expressed regret. Regretful men more fre
quently reported surgical (43%) versus chemical (36%) castration (P = .030)
and nausea in the past week (54% v 32%; P = .010) but less frequently repo
rted erectile dysfunction (56% v 72%; P = .048). Regretful men indicated po
orer scores on every measure of generic and prostate cancer-related quality
of life. Qualitative analyses revealed substantial uncertainty about the p
rogress of their disease and the quality of the decisions in which patients
participated.
Conclusion: Regret was substantial and associated with treatment choice and
quality of life. It may derive from underlying psychosocial distress and p
roblematic communication with physicians when decisions are being reached a
nd over subsequent years. J Clin Oncol 19:72-80. (C) 2001 by American Socie
ty of Clinical Oncology.