The extent to which authority is centralized varies greatly across time and
space, as the experience of Europe over the past half century illustrates.
This article initiates a dialogue between two literatures: the neoclassica
l theory of authority and the analysis of multi-level governance. Neoclassi
cal theory examines the tension between the benefits of centralization and
the costs of imposing uniformity across diverse territories. It implies tha
t multi-level governance is the optimal response to this trade-off. This ar
ticle critically examines the assumptions of neoclassical theory, and offer
s some building blocks for an alternative approach.