Large systematic scale differences show up when subjects are asked to
match the curvature of a haptically presented surface with a visually
presented cross section. Scaling factors ranging from 0.3 to 3.0 were
found. Most often (for five out of six subjects) haptically estimated
curvature was overestimated relative to visual curvature. We conclude
that mutually inconsistent representations of surface curvature coexis
t in a single observer in the haptic and visual modalities. Another co
nclusion can be drawn with certainty, namely that at least one of the
two modalities does not provide the observer with veridical informatio
n. The results for the left and the right hand of a subject were very
similar, though for two subjects there existed a small significant dif
ference in scaling. It seems likely that the curvature representations
of the two hands are not independent of one another, but our data do
not permit us to be conclusive.