The premise of the paper is that the fervor for foreign exchange market int
ervention by U.S, and European monetary authorities has ebbed in recent yea
rs. A pattern of initial belief in the effectiveness of foreign exchange ma
rket intervention has recently been eroded, as is revealed by the absence o
f intervention in circumstances that in earlier times would have invoked it
. Only the Bank of Japan among central banks of the developed world has not
thusfar abandoned its faith that intervention can change the relative valu
e of the yen as determined by market forces to conform with its notion of w
hat that value should be. To explain why U.S. and European monetary authori
ties no longer believe that intervention is a tool that works, I review the
equivocal record of past episodes, the inconclusive results of empirical r
esearch, and the problems of implementation that intervention advocates ign
ore.