Onchocerciasis in a nonendemic population: Clinical and immunologic assessment before treatment and at the time of presumed cure

Citation
Nl. Henry et al., Onchocerciasis in a nonendemic population: Clinical and immunologic assessment before treatment and at the time of presumed cure, J INFEC DIS, 183(3), 2001, pp. 512-516
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Clinical Immunolgy & Infectious Disease",Immunology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
ISSN journal
00221899 → ACNP
Volume
183
Issue
3
Year of publication
2001
Pages
512 - 516
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-1899(20010201)183:3<512:OIANPC>2.0.ZU;2-P
Abstract
Although suppressive therapy for onchocerciasis with intermittent ivermecti n prevents the development of pathology in endemic populations, the clinica l and immunologic effects of therapy in the absence of continued exposure a re unknown. To address this question, 14 patients treated with ivermectin f or onchocerciasis acquired >10 years ago during temporary residence in Afri ca were reevaluated. None had evidence of continued infection or pathology at follow-up. Although eosinophilia, serum IgE, and antifilarial antibody l evels decreased after ivermectin therapy, none of these parameters was usef ul in predicting the resolution of symptoms in infected patients. Periphera l blood mononuclear cells isolated from patients at follow-up were more res ponsive to parasite antigen in vitro, which is as assessed by proliferation and production of interferon-gamma and interleukin (IL)-5. In contrast, an tigen-induced levels of IL-10 were significantly decreased at follow-up, co nsistent with diminished down-regulatory factors rather than a switch from type 2 to type 1 immune responses.