Introduction: In this study, patients with rate hysteresis pacemakers impla
nted for vasovagal syncope were re-studied using serial tilt testing to det
ermine whether, once triggered, pacing was more effective if the interventi
on rate was higher than the standard rate.
Methods and Results: Twenty patients (mean age 55.4 years, range 23-81, 14
male) were studied, with randomisation to either initial standard rate (80-
90 beats/min) intervention, or to initial high rate (120 beats/min) interve
ntion. Although 18 of the 20 reported complete abolition of syncope since p
acing, only 8 patients could be objectively assessed. The respective mean t
ime to tilt down after symptom onset with standard and high rate interventi
on was 193 +/- 234 s and 185 +/- 143 s, (P > 0.05).
Conclusion: Repeat tilt testing was only of limited value in assessing the
benefit of pacing. There was no advantage with high rate intervention in de
laying the loss of consciousness (or intolerable symptoms) after the initia
l onset of symptoms.