Sensitivity and reproducibility of volume change measurements of differentbrain portions on magnetic resonance imaging in patients with multiple sclerosis
M. Rovaris et al., Sensitivity and reproducibility of volume change measurements of differentbrain portions on magnetic resonance imaging in patients with multiple sclerosis, J NEUROL, 247(12), 2000, pp. 960-965
The course of multiple sclerosis (MS) can be monitored by measuring changes
in brain volume, but consensus is still lacking on the best strategy to be
adopted. We compared the reproducibility and sensitivity of volume measure
ments from different brain portions for detecting changes on magnetic reson
ance imaging (MRI) in patients with MS. T1-weighted MRI of the brain was pe
rformed in 50 patients with relapsing-remitting MS at study entry and after
an average follow-up of 18.4 months. Using a semiautomated technique for b
rain parenchyma segmentation, the volumes of the following brain portions w
ere measured: (a) the whole brain (whole-brain volume, WBV), (b) the seven
slices rostral to the velum interpositum (seven-slice volume, SSV), (c) the
central slice of the image set (central-slice volume, CSV) and (d) the inf
ratentorial regions (infratentorial-brain volume, IBV). All these measureme
nts were carried out by a single observer and were repeated twice on ten ra
ndomly selected scans to test the intra-observer reproducibility using the
four strategies. At follow-up there was a significant decrease in all the m
easures of brain volume (P ranged from 0.002 to < 0.001). The univariate co
rrelations between changes in WBV, SSV, CSV and IBV were all statistically
significant, with the exception of that between changes in CSV and IBV; r v
alues ranged from 0.34 (for the WBV/IBV correlation) to 0.80 (for the WBV/S
SV correlation). The mean intra-observer coefficient of variations were 1.9
% for WBV, 1.5 % for SSV, 2.9 % for CSV and 2.2 % for IBV measurements. Th
e measurement of volume on a portion of brain selectively including the reg
ions in which MS pathology is more diffuse is as reliable and sensitive to
disease-related changes as that on the whole brain, with significant time s
aving for processing.