Background Clinical and service evaluation often fails to accommodate suffi
ciently to parental perspectives and priorities concerning health intervent
ions. Although parent satisfaction questionnaires are widely used, these as
sess issues chosen by the researcher. Quality of life research methods, how
ever, can assess individual priorities.
Methods A Schedule for Evaluation of Quality of Life was adapted to record
the nature, and relative importance of parental concerns about their child
before child psychiatric hospital admission. Level of concern or worry was
assessed pre- and post-admission, and at 1 year follow-up, with a waiting-l
ist control. Data were analysed qualitatively and quantitatively for indivi
duals and groups of cases.
Results The adapted instrument was feasible and clinically useful. It did n
ot show repeated measurement effects but was sensitive to the effects of in
tervention (hospital admission). Effects (reduction in levels of concern) r
emained evident at 1 year follow-up.
Conclusion The instrument is brief, non-intrusive, and sensitive to change,
It has utility for clinical case evaluation. It may complement satisfactio
n questionnaires, and has advantages over rating scales for the evaluation
of treatment outcomes.