A. Mengarelli et al., Idarubicin intensified BUCY2 regimen in allogeneic unmanipulated transplant for high-risk hematological malignancies, LEUKEMIA, 14(12), 2000, pp. 2052-2058
Twenty-nine consecutive patients with high-risk hematological malignancy ag
ed from 3 to 58 years underwent an unmanipulated graft from an HLA-identica
l sibling after an irradiation-free preparative regimen consisting of idaru
bicin (IDA), 21 mg/m(2)/day administered by continuous infusion on days -12
and -11, followed by busulphan (BU), 4 mg/kg/day orally from day -7 to -4,
and cyclophosphamide (CY), 60 mg/kg/day intravenously on days 3 and -2 (ID
A-BUCY2). Most clinically relevant extra-hematological regimen-related toxi
cities consisted of stomatitis observed in all subjects and hemorrhagic cys
titis occurred in five cases (17%) within 100 days after transplant. Six pa
tients (21%) developed a grade 2 acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and
three (10%) a grade 3 or 4; extensive chronic GVHD was assessed in nine of
22 (41%) evaluable patients. So far, 12 patients have died and 17 are aliv
e, 16 of whom disease-free, 5-41 months after transplant (median, 15 months
). The causes of death were related to GVHD in three patients, to sepsis in
one and to disease recurrence in the remaining eight. At present, only one
of nine relapsed patients is alive. For all patients the actuarial probabi
lity of survival (OS) at 1 and 2 years+/-standard error (s.e.) was 63+/-9%
and 52+/-10%, respectively. The actuarial probabilities of disease-free sur
vival (DFS), relapse and transplant-related mortality (TRM) at both I and 2
years +/- s.e. were 53+/-9%, 35+/-9% and 16+/-7%, respectively. These resu
lts are encouraging but not substantially different from those obtained in
28 patients with malignancy in advanced phase transplanted after the standa
rd BUCY2 regimen, who had an actuarial probability of OS, DFS, relapse and
TRM projected at 10 years+/-s.e. of 54+/-10%, 57+/-9%, 36+/-9% and 11+/-6%,
respectively. Although the retrospective comparison between the two groups
does not seem to show any advantage in the use of the IDA intensified regi
men, only a prospective randomized trial could answer this question.