John Mollenkopf asks pertinent and interesting questions. His analysis is,
however, overly influenced by U.S. assumptions about the purposes of welfar
e provision. In Europe, until very recently, the underlying assumptions of
the welfare state had little to do with steering its clients into employmen
t. White guilt over colonialism and racism, together with the traditional D
utch enthusiasm for separate co-existence, are additional reasons for a lac
k of alarm over welfare dependence. From the point of view of urban sociolo
gy, the really interesting questions arise from the divergent trajectories
of differ ent ethnic communities. Muslim communities in Amsterdam, for exam
ple, are more excluded from work than others, which may say more about the
underlying principles on which Dutch racism is based than the operation of
the welfare state.