The outcome of retinopathy of prematurity - Screening for retinopathy of prematurity using an outcome predictive program

Citation
Cb. Onofrey et al., The outcome of retinopathy of prematurity - Screening for retinopathy of prematurity using an outcome predictive program, OPHTHALMOL, 108(1), 2001, pp. 27-34
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Optalmology,"da verificare
Journal title
OPHTHALMOLOGY
ISSN journal
01616420 → ACNP
Volume
108
Issue
1
Year of publication
2001
Pages
27 - 34
Database
ISI
SICI code
0161-6420(200101)108:1<27:TOOROP>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the calculated risk of pr ogression to threshold retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) and risk of an unfa vorable structural outcome using the computer program, RM-ROP, with the obs erved incidence for infants born at Jackson Memorial Hospital (JMH) and to determine how many children would have been treated unnecessarily if the th reshold criteria for treatment were lowered on the basis of the clinical fi ndings and RM-ROP risk calculations. Design: Noncomparative interventional case series. Participants: All 292 surviving premature infants weighing 1250 g or less a t birth and born at JMH between January 1, 1997, and December 31, 1998, wer e included in the study. Methods: Baseline demographic factors and data from sequential ophthalmic e xaminations were entered into the RM-ROP program for risk calculation. infa nts reaching threshold disease received diode laser indirect photocoagulati on of the avascular retina. Three-month follow-up was obtained for infants receiving laser treatment. Main Outcome Measures: The development of threshold ROP and an unfavorable structural outcome, defined as a posterior retinal fold or posterior retina l detachment occurring within 3 months of threshold disease. Results: Thirty-eight eyes were diagnosed with threshold ROP, with 18 of 20 subjects having bilateral disease. Three-month posttreatment follow-up was obtained on all 20 children, with 19 having good structural outcomes. Thir ty-two percent of eyes (12 of 38) reaching threshold never had a risk estim ate greater than 0.10. However, only 6% of eyes (35 of 546) that did not re ach threshold ever had a model predicted risk greater than 0.15. All right eyes with zone 1 prethreshold disease, 60% of those with zone 2 stage 2+ di sease, and 23% with zone 2 stage 3 disease progressed to threshold ROP. Conclusions: The similarity between the risk distributions for the Miami an d the Multicenter Trial of Cryotherapy for Retinopathy of Prematurity study indicates the similarity in the populations with respect to risk factors i dentified as important by the model. The Miami data validated the model, wi th eyes reaching threshold having higher risks than eyes that did not. Actu al risk estimates for eyes reaching threshold can be small. Changing the th reshold criteria for treatment on the basis of various clinical and compute r-generated prethreshold risk levels in our population would have resulted in the unnecessary treatment of many infants who never progressed to thresh old disease. in the Miami population, if the model were used to manage an i ndividual subject, close attention would have to be paid to small differenc es in risk. Although the RM-ROP software program may be a useful tool for f ollowing premature infants with ROP, the clinical examination remains the " gold standard." Ophthalmology 2001;108:27-35 (C) 2001 by the American Acade my of Ophthalmology.